Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in Microsoft Word, OpenOffice, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
- The text adheres to the stylistic requirements (including referencing) outlined in the Author Guidelines.
- To ensure a blind peer-review process, any information that could identify the authors has been removed from the manuscript.
- I confirm that I have read and understood the STSS policy on AI use in manuscripts outlined in the Author Guidelines, and comply with the stated requirements. If AI has been used, I have fully disclosed its use in this submission.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Sections
Articles
We welcome high standard academic articles on transition societies. Papers that have been published articulate both theoretical and comparative, as well as quantitative and qualitative approaches. Before submitting your paper, please ensure it aligns with the journal’s Focus and Scope and review the Author Guidelines.
Book review
If you want to review a book, please contact one of our Book Review Editors so that you can check when there is a slot available, whether the book is appropriate for the journal, and what the deadlines are for submission.
From 2022, STSS will only review academic books for sale under €35
At STSS we have become concerned by the pricing policy of some academic publishers, making knowledge difficult to access especially to scholars based in some regions of the world. In addition, we fail to understand why some publishers can manage to produce books that sell at €10-20 and others keep publishing hardbacks selling at €100+ and more, thus undermining the purchasing power of libraries and departments.
As a result of our reflections, starting from 2022, we will no longer review books that sell for more than €35. We are aware that this is a drop in the ocean and will limit the choice of books, but you have to stand for what you believe in. We believe that the pricing policy of some publishers is abusive and exploitative and is ultimately harming science. We, therefore, wish to support publishers that work hard to deliver quality science at an accessible price (and there are actually quite a few of them out there now)
Book Reviews should be between 1,000 and 1,500 words in length. In exceptional cases (longer book reviews including 2-3 titles together) this limit can be exceeded.
In general, we would advise you to cover the following questions:
- What is the book about and how does it fit within the literature?
- What are the main points (chapters, themes) of the book? Are they addressed in innovative ways?
- Why is the book interesting? (How might it benefit readers?)
- What are the highlights (best elements) of the book?
- What are its main shortcomings? What could have been approached differently, deepened, or improved (main criticisms)?
- What would be a good audience for the book? Does it have policy implications?
We advise you to use a sandwich structure in drafting your book review: praise the book, provide an outline of the content, provide 1-2 main criticisms, and finally explain why the book is worthwhile reading.
Please add a short biographical statement (a couple of sentences) to the end of the review. There should be no titles before or after your name (Prof, PhD, MA). Books and journal names, if included, are in italics, project names in single ‘quotation marks’.